I think this
https://www.brewersfriend.com/homebrew/recipe/view/1576426/lutra-ipa is one of the top 3 IPA's I've brewed for aroma, period. I've had beers with less aroma quantity, but maybe more distinct character. The thiolized yeast for the NEIPA was off-the-hook aroma wise but the flavor was very, very tropical which is great if you love tropical flavor and aroma in beer, but it's definitely a niche beer.
I've certainly used more hops - a lot more and gotten less for it.
Belgian-ish IPA
https://www.brewersfriend.com/homebrew/recipe/view/1555555/biipa again, if you like Belgians and IPAs, it's right in the lane, but you better like phenols ! Wait, can I say phenols here?

It's definitely got a distinctive wheat beer like aroma from the yeast but the hops are a nice compliment. I actually still have this on tap and while the aroma is falling off, it's still prominent and good.
I did one prior that was way too bitter and followed it up with this one
https://www.brewersfriend.com/homebrew/recipe/view/1393175/orphan-red
which for a "ginger" IPA, had great aroma and flavor.
I've got hops on order now - magnum, chinook, citra, centennial, CTZ, and I already have strata, mosaic, Idaho 7, and I'm sure I'm forgetting something.
My thinking is I'll do a small, token charge for 60m, nothing crazy, and load up the back end hops and whirlpool.
- I think probably Idaho 7, Mosaic are really nice for whirlpools, but I'm also thinking a solid "C" hop combination might be nice. I will be shooting for 6-6.5 ABV let's say around 65 IBU, but 55-65 is fine.
So, load up on the later boil hops?
whirlpool, or no whirlpool and just stick with flavor and aroma additions in the boil? - I've done both, but leaning toward whirlpool.