- Joined
- Aug 23, 2024
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 38
- Points
- 13
My latest brew is currently in the bottle conditioning stage. The recipe for this Irish Red Ale can be found here:
https://www.brewersfriend.com/homebrew/recipe/view/1528312/bonham-buckley-s-irish-red
Expected SG after mash 1.034 Recorded SG of 1.033 (1.021 at 125*)

Expected OG after boil 1.046 Recorded OG of 1.050 (I started with a lower strike water volume)

Prior to pitching yeast, I added water to bring the OG down to recipe generated 1.046
After 2 weeks of fermentation, the recorded FG was 1.004

I started with 3.75 gallons of strike water. After 1 hour, I removed and squeezed bag, ending up with 3.5 gallons.
Started the boil at 3.5 gallons, and after 1 hour and chilling, my volume was at 2.5 gallons. Adding the 28 oz of water brought my volume to 2.72 gallons.
Yeast ( Safale S-04) was pitched at 58* and temp slowly climbed to 70* over a couple of days. I fermented in my bottling bucket.
I bottled on Super Sunday...

I am concerned that the FG is so very low, showing an apparent attenuation of 91%
What could contribute to that drastic of an attenuation?
Thanks,
Todd
https://www.brewersfriend.com/homebrew/recipe/view/1528312/bonham-buckley-s-irish-red
Expected SG after mash 1.034 Recorded SG of 1.033 (1.021 at 125*)

Expected OG after boil 1.046 Recorded OG of 1.050 (I started with a lower strike water volume)

Prior to pitching yeast, I added water to bring the OG down to recipe generated 1.046
After 2 weeks of fermentation, the recorded FG was 1.004

I started with 3.75 gallons of strike water. After 1 hour, I removed and squeezed bag, ending up with 3.5 gallons.
Started the boil at 3.5 gallons, and after 1 hour and chilling, my volume was at 2.5 gallons. Adding the 28 oz of water brought my volume to 2.72 gallons.
Yeast ( Safale S-04) was pitched at 58* and temp slowly climbed to 70* over a couple of days. I fermented in my bottling bucket.
I bottled on Super Sunday...

I am concerned that the FG is so very low, showing an apparent attenuation of 91%
What could contribute to that drastic of an attenuation?
Thanks,
Todd


