- Joined
- Jul 16, 2012
- Messages
- 10,254
- Reaction score
- 8,362
- Points
- 113
I've wondered about the new conversion calculations requiring the total volume of water used, so I went with it on this recipe. The following was the result:
Here's a close-up of that efficiency:
It was a mutt brew so I wasn't really careful with my volumes. Here's a link to the recipe:
https://www.brewersfriend.com/homebrew/recipe/view/1010854/speltweizen/343184
There is no sugar or anything else that should have punched the efficiency above 100%. So there's something I'm not getting about how the efficiency is calculated. As mentioned above, I've questioned it for some time. Now I have an impossible result. My only hypothesis is it's using the rice hulls as convertable grain weight.
Here's a close-up of that efficiency:
It was a mutt brew so I wasn't really careful with my volumes. Here's a link to the recipe:
https://www.brewersfriend.com/homebrew/recipe/view/1010854/speltweizen/343184
There is no sugar or anything else that should have punched the efficiency above 100%. So there's something I'm not getting about how the efficiency is calculated. As mentioned above, I've questioned it for some time. Now I have an impossible result. My only hypothesis is it's using the rice hulls as convertable grain weight.