- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
- Messages
- 2,717
- Reaction score
- 4,428
- Points
- 113
60 because I am used to it, and volume into the fermenter is somewhat predictable at 60 minutes.
My opinion only —-> I do a shorter boil because I can perceive no difference in the finished beer in my rinky-dink brewhouse between 30 minutes and 60. I never set out to shorten my brew day, but I’m not into time wasting either. If there is a solid reason as to why I should boil for 60 minutes, I will strongly consider going back to 60, or whatever. I settled on 30 because it was a nice round number. I assume all the original home brew recipes that set the standard were written for 60 minute boils because it made everything neat and tidy, not necessarily because 60 is some magic boil number. Or am I wrong? I certainly could be.Honestly, 60 mins is the standard for many reasons. as long as you havent gotten into your 15 min hops you can always extend the boil. I dont really know why you would do a shorter boil. the only time that i have done a shorter boil is when we were boiling off a kettle sour. It had already been boiled and we pumped it back to the kettle to boil for 30 mins to clear up and bugs before we pushed it through our hoses/heatex.
Which styles would you boil for just 30 minutes? I would be keen to give it a try.Either 30 or 60 depending on style/how much time I have, never 90
I do mash longer than an hour, generally closer to 2 hours. Seems to help me a lot.For my past several brews, I have boiled for 75 minutes, which allows me to hit my gravity and volume targets. Over the same span, I have extended the mash from 60 to 80 minutes, again to hit pre boil gravity.
Anything that doesn't require a 60 minute hop addition to hit target IBUsWhich styles would you boil for just 30 minutes? I would be keen to give it a try.
It's not so much the time gain, but more the use of gas as we gotta buy it in bottles