Bottle conditioned.....

cafelinhchi

New Member
Trial Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2015
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Am I the only one that thinks if a brew is bottle conditioned, that fact should be predominantly displayed on the bottle?

I'm ok with conditioning, I can deal with it, but I don't know, I would prefer to be warned. Thoughts?
 
You mean commercial examples? Most who do so should likely display it, as it's a more costly process than forced carbonation. I bottle and bottle condition everything I do.
 
The commercial beers I see say, " unfiltered ". I usually pick it up and check the bottom of the bottle which has way less yeast on the bottom than mine do.
 
It doesn't take a lot of yeast to condition a bottle. If you're getting much more than a dusting of yeast on the bottom of your bottles, you're bottling too early (except for Weizens and other beers depending on suspended yeast as part of their profile). A beer can look perfectly clear and still have 100,000 cells/ml in suspension, more than enough to condition a beer. Moral: Wait until your beer is bright before bottling (exceptions noted above).
 
Noseybear, I can't wait that long!!!!
 
SwampWater said:
Noseybear, I can't wait that long!!!!

Impatience is understandable, but that is the difference between great beer, and fantastic beer.
 

Back
Top