You're welcome! That's an interesting suggestion, and potentially one that others might like as well. Let me add it to our list and see if there's a way for us to do this with one of our future updates. Thanks!

Alright, so I did some digging with people here, and here's what it seems like is happening. The equipment profile, where it's going to take into account the deadspace/etc. loss that you account for is used during the brew session, not in the recipe builder itself. This means that when the...

Thanks Martin (and everyone else, of course)!

Please do! I'd really love to learn more about this whole process. There's always something new to learn in life, and brewing is no exception.

Ah, I see what you're saying. I'm not really sure about this one, but I'll definitely add it to the list of things to look into going forward.

I think it actually makes sense that it went up -- you're keeping the sugars the same, but lowering the volume (from 6.75 to 6), so you'd have a higher concentration of sugars, so a higher SG.

This hasn't been added yet, but thanks for keeping it on our radar!

Thanks for bumping this, I'll add it to our list of things we can look into adding at some point.

Hmm... that's really interesting, thanks for bringing it up. I'd suggest setting the Boil Volume and Batch Volume (fermenter) to the same amount (in your case, 6 gallons). When I did that, the boil gravity and original (post-boil) gravity lined up. Check out these screenshots, hopefully that...

Hey Martin - at this point the web calculation for gravity is slightly more accurate. - Matt

I totally hear you - thanks for the kind words! We're definitely trying to be more active and more responsive going forward. You guys do such a good job of giving us really useful feedback, the least we can do is ensure that you know you're being heard. On a related note, I'm really excited...

Hmm... interesting idea. I'll add it to the list of things we'll take a look at going forward. Thanks for the feedback!

Thanks for the feedback, Tim (and everyone else). We've heard these requests echoed elsewhere, and they're all on our list of things to address. Thanks!

:lol: true enough... I guess we absolutely COULD.

Thank you for supporting it! Seriously - we couldn't do it without you guys.

Hey edwood, thanks for the feedback! We've gotten similar requests to #1 before, and that's definitely something we're actively exploring as we update the software. For #2, I'll be sure to pass that feedback along to our team and we'll keep it in mind as we're prioritizing updates. Thanks -...

Thanks for bumping this, I'll see about getting that added to our database today! EDIT: It's there now. Thanks for letting me know it needed to get in there. Prost!

Hey - thanks for the feedback! Yes, we're aware of both the gravity and style discrepancies between the web and mobile versions, and it's definitely high on our list of updates to make. Thanks!

Yeah, it's a great feature of the Windows app. It's on our list :D

Hmmm, that's an interesting idea. We'd have to look into the best way to format this (since you'd be setting date ranges, not just number of days), but it's something we can certainly look into. I think the higher priority would be getting the Dry Hop - (Primary/Secondary/Keg), where you can set...