<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Labs Burton Ale Yeast or Wyeast Thames Valley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brewersfriend.com/2009/04/09/white-labs-burton-ale-yeast-or-wyeast-thames-valley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brewersfriend.com/2009/04/09/white-labs-burton-ale-yeast-or-wyeast-thames-valley/</link>
	<description>We can have fun brewing beer together online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:36:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.brewersfriend.com/2009/04/09/white-labs-burton-ale-yeast-or-wyeast-thames-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewersfriend.com/?p=726#comment-527</guid>
		<description>After ruminating on this issue, I believe he off flavor I was tasting was probably yeast in suspension.  My beers have benefited greatly from 2-3 weeks in the fridge. They are best 60-90 days after the initial brew, but are still great tasting after a year. This gives enough time for the yeast to finish their work and come to rest in the bottom of the bottle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After ruminating on this issue, I believe he off flavor I was tasting was probably yeast in suspension.  My beers have benefited greatly from 2-3 weeks in the fridge. They are best 60-90 days after the initial brew, but are still great tasting after a year. This gives enough time for the yeast to finish their work and come to rest in the bottom of the bottle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.brewersfriend.com/2009/04/09/white-labs-burton-ale-yeast-or-wyeast-thames-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 20:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewersfriend.com/?p=726#comment-76</guid>
		<description>It certainly could be a different strain. Perhaps the flavor was imparted by the crystal 40, but it was only 10% of the batch, so I&#039;m not sure that is the cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly could be a different strain. Perhaps the flavor was imparted by the crystal 40, but it was only 10% of the batch, so I&#8217;m not sure that is the cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.brewersfriend.com/2009/04/09/white-labs-burton-ale-yeast-or-wyeast-thames-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Wahoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewersfriend.com/?p=726#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  I often use Thames Valley yeast in my bitters, and never have experienced that type of taste.  I am wondering if the Wyeast and White Labs version of these yeasts aren&#039;t slightly different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  I often use Thames Valley yeast in my bitters, and never have experienced that type of taste.  I am wondering if the Wyeast and White Labs version of these yeasts aren&#8217;t slightly different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.brewersfriend.com/2009/04/09/white-labs-burton-ale-yeast-or-wyeast-thames-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewersfriend.com/?p=726#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Hi James,
Thanks for catching that! Yep, I meant FG, and its fixed.  Have fun brewing!

Larry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James,<br />
Thanks for catching that! Yep, I meant FG, and its fixed.  Have fun brewing!</p>
<p>Larry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Golovich</title>
		<link>http://www.brewersfriend.com/2009/04/09/white-labs-burton-ale-yeast-or-wyeast-thames-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>James Golovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewersfriend.com/?p=726#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Good to know about this yeast.  I was going to try it out in a pale but it sounds like it would do well in a porter.

BTW: In your attenuation lines you say your OG was X, I suspect you mean FG since starting at 1.008 or 1.010 would be pretty bad mash efficiency</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know about this yeast.  I was going to try it out in a pale but it sounds like it would do well in a porter.</p>
<p>BTW: In your attenuation lines you say your OG was X, I suspect you mean FG since starting at 1.008 or 1.010 would be pretty bad mash efficiency</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.123 seconds -->

